SEC’s Long-standing Consideration of Ethereum as a Security Sparks Legal Action from Consensys

SEC’s Long-standing Consideration of Ethereum as a Security Sparks Legal Action from Consensys

Recent revelations suggest that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), led by Chairman Gary Gensler, has viewed Ethereum as a security for at least a year, prompting Consensys, a major developer of Ethereum software, to file a complaint against the agency.

According to reports from FOX Business, Consensys submitted an unredacted complaint after discovering the SEC’s prolonged consideration of Ethereum’s regulatory status. The complaint reveals that the SEC’s investigation into Ethereum 2.0 was rooted in the agency’s belief that certain securities, including ETH, may have been offered and sold since at least 2018.

Ongoing Scrutiny and Document Requests

Documents presented in the Consensys lawsuit disclose that the SEC has issued multiple requests for information over the past year, seeking details about Consensys’ involvement in Ethereum’s proof-of-stake (PoS) update, as well as its acquisitions, holdings, and sales of Ethereum. Moreover, there are indications that the SEC may perceive sales of Ethereum, even predating the 2018 merger, as securities.

Contradictions and Uncertainty

The SEC’s classification of Ethereum as a security stands in contrast to previous guidance provided under former Chairman Jay Clayton, as well as statements made by then-CFO Bill Hinman in June 2018, asserting that Ethereum, like Bitcoin, is not a security. Gensler’s recent reluctance to provide a definitive stance on Ethereum’s regulatory status has fueled concerns within the crypto industry, particularly amidst Ethereum’s transition to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism.

Legal Action to Protect Ethereum

Consensys took legal action against the SEC in response to a Wells notice received on April 10, indicating the regulator’s intent to pursue enforcement action related to Consensys’ MetaMask wallet services. Emphasizing that MetaMask does not function as a broker and does not store clients’ digital assets or facilitate transactions, Consensys seeks to prevent the SEC from exerting regulatory oversight over the Ethereum blockchain.

Conclusion: Legal Battle Over Ethereum’s Regulatory Status

The revelation of the SEC’s prolonged consideration of Ethereum as a security has sparked legal action from Consensys, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty surrounding Ethereum’s regulatory classification. As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome will have significant implications for the future of Ethereum and the broader crypto industry’s regulatory landscape.

Powered by Crypto Expert BD

Follow us on Twitter:

Join our Telegram channel:


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *